# Making IT costs transparent: cost blocks, attribution, metrics and the value of IT > What your IT really costs and what for: make cost blocks visible, attribute effort to the areas that cause it, separate run from change, and evidence the contribution IT makes. URL: https://techport.ai/en/it-beratung/it-strategie-und-steuerung/it-kosten-und-wertbeitrag --- 1. [IT Consulting](/en/it-beratung)/ 2. [IT Strategy and Steering](/en/it-beratung/it-strategie-und-steuerung)/ 3. IT costs and value contribution [IT Strategy and Steering](/en/it-beratung/it-strategie-und-steuerung) # IT costs and value contribution By Redaktion techport.ai, IT-Beratung · Last updated on 21 August 2026 The question of what IT costs can be answered in most companies. The question of what for usually cannot. The accounts show a total that contains maintenance contracts, licences, hardware, providers, cloud invoices and staff costs, spread across cost centres defined years ago. As soon as someone wants to cut deliberately, the basis for the decision is missing, and savings land where they hurt least rather than where they do least harm. Cost transparency in IT is not a controlling project. It is about being able to answer three questions: what running operations cost, what change costs, and which area causes which share. ## How you notice it * Budget planning extrapolates last year's figure because there is no better basis. * Cloud invoices rise and nobody can name the service responsible. * Departments order services that are paid centrally and therefore feel no cost. * It is unclear what share of the budget goes into maintaining what exists and what share into something new. ## Why this happens IT costs accumulate over many years and many small decisions. Contracts renew automatically, licences are bought per person and never returned, test environments keep running, and cloud services are billed by consumption without anyone watching consumption. On top of that, accounting structures costs by type while IT thinks in systems. These two views cannot be connected without an intermediate step, and that step is almost always missing. ## How we go about it 1. **Make the cost blocks visible.** We collect all IT related costs from accounting, contracts and invoices, including those that run outside the IT cost centre. Experience shows a significant share appears that was not previously counted as IT cost. 2. **Separate run from change.** We assign every block to one of two categories: maintaining operations, or change. This ratio is the most important steering figure in IT because it shows how much room to manoeuvre exists at all. 3. **Attribute to the causes.** We attribute costs to the areas that trigger them, using simple and understandable keys such as number of users, number of devices or modules in use. The aim is not accuracy to the euro but a conversation with the departments based on numbers. 4. **Evidence the value and steer.** We connect costs with effect: working time saved, throughput times shortened, outages avoided, growth enabled. Added to that are a few metrics reported regularly so the discussion does not happen once a year in the budget round. ## What you gain * A basis for decisions about savings that do not endanger operations. * Departments that know the costs and therefore order differently. * A demonstrable run to change ratio that shows how much room IT has. ## From our projects When we assemble costs completely for the first time, the actual total regularly exceeds the figure visible in the IT cost centre by a clear margin. The difference sits in departmental budgets, in maintenance shares of machine contracts and in cloud services on company credit cards. The second recurring finding concerns licences: between ten and twenty percent of paid accounts are unused or belong to people who have left. Both can be realised without any technical change, and both come back within two years unless someone introduces a recurring review. ## Häufige Fragen How high should IT costs be relative to revenue? There is no meaningful general target. The spread between industries is greater than the spread within one, and a low figure can equally mean efficiency or underinvestment. What is informative is your own trend across three years and the split between run and change. Should we charge IT costs back internally? Full internal charging rarely pays off in the mid-market because the effort is high and the argument about allocation keys is intense. What almost always helps is transparent attribution without actual charging: every area sees what it causes without money being moved. That alone changes ordering behaviour noticeably. ## Let us talk about IT costs and value contribution In a thirty minute first call we work out where your biggest lever sits and whether we are the right people for it. [Arrange an initial call](/en/kontakt)[Our consulting](/en/so-funktionierts) ## Further reading [IT Strategy and SteeringDeveloping an IT strategyHow business goals become an IT strategy that departments understand and management supports: target picture, fields of action, sequence, effort and measurable results.](/en/it-beratung/it-strategie-und-steuerung/it-strategie)[IT Strategy and SteeringSteering IT providersWhat you do yourselves and what you buy: make the sourcing decision, steer managed services, measure performance, limit dependency and negotiate contracts that hold at the exit.](/en/it-beratung/it-strategie-und-steuerung/sourcing-und-dienstleister)[IT Governance and ComplianceLicences and IT contractsCount licences correctly, review contracts on the points that count, prepare for vendor audits, cap price increases and agree an orderly exit.](/en/it-beratung/it-governance-und-recht/lizenzen-und-vertraege)[KnowledgeIT metricsDefinitions and formulas read the same way across the company.](/en/it-beratung/kennzahlen)[KnowledgeIT maturity checkKnow where your IT stands in ten minutes.](/en/it-beratung/reifegrad-check) Back to the field [IT Strategy and Steering](/en/it-beratung/it-strategie-und-steuerung) Rt Written by [Redaktion techport.ai](/ueber-uns), IT-Beratung Mehr als 15 Jahre Erfahrung in IT-Projekten des Mittelstands, Auswahl und Einführung von Unternehmenssoftware, Aufbau von IT-Betrieb und Informationssicherheit in wachsenden Organisationen. [More about us](/en/ueber-uns) More from techport.ai [ Software Custom process software for mid-sized companies. ](/en/loesungen)[ HR consulting People processes and the systems behind them. ](/en/hr-beratung)[ IT maturity check Ten minutes to a clear position. ](/en/it-beratung/reifegrad-check)[ HR maturity check 24 statements, a result per field. ](/en/hr-beratung/reifegrad-check)[ Funding BAFA grant plus more than 50 programmes for delivery. ](/en/foerderung)[ Process in practice How workflows become reliable software. ](/en/sop-praxis)[ Data and AI Analysis, forecasts and assistance systems. ](/en/daten-ki)[ About us The people behind techport.ai. ](/en/ueber-uns)